|
Alternative Positioning Technologies
Today, there is a vast array of so-called location technologies that are involved in the calculation of a user’s
or object’s position in a space or grid, based on some mathematical model. Positioning here means allowing a mobile
device to be aware of it’s location with different degrees of precision and accuracy. The technology required for provision
of automated location information to mobile devices has been in continual development for several decades. While the majority
has its roots in military, modern consumer technology is also raising to meet the challenges, specifically in metropolitan
areas. Telecommunication initiatives like the US FCC’s E911 and Europe’s E112 have generated a lot of interest
in applications and services that are a function of a user’s or an object’s location, referred to as location-based
services (LBS) .
Unfortunately, millions of square meters of indoor space and urban areas are out of reach
of GPS systems. Conventional GPS receivers don’t work inside buildings due to absence of line of sight to satellites,
while cellular positioning methods generally fail to provide a satisfactory degree of accuracy. The delivered position fixes
cannot be used for determining whether a target person stays inside or outside a certain building, not to mention that it
is by no means possible to locate it with the granularity of rooms or floors. Fortunately, over the past decade, advances
in location possible to locate users and objects indoors. These alternative technologies are now being introduced to the market
enabling indoor (in-building) positioning. Outside the remit of 2G, 2.5G, 3G, and
4G cellular networks, exist other families of positioning technologies that are often referred to as ‘local positioning,’
which make use of short range networks such as 802.11, Bluetooth, RFID, ultrasound, UWB, IrDA, or TV radio signals. There are different types of indoor, urban, and seamless indoor-outdoor location-aware applications, their requirements
in terms of the infrastructure needed to support them, and the current limitations. EXAMPLE 1: THE NEED AND UTILITY
OF A DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ADVANCED 3D LOCATOR SYSTEM There is a need to be able to accurately locate
and track incident responders in situations such as: inside of threatened buildings, collapsed buildings, and subterranean
facilities or underground.

Accurate location and tracking is necessary in order to allow emergency managers, including fire chiefs and other
incident commanders, to rapidly and effectively deploy and re-deploy their forces or understand and respond to the consequences
of potential threats to their forces. The systems have to be fast, have to be able to find information with respect to the
context and have to be able to integrate different data (existing or coming from the field) for further analysis and decision-making.

Consider the Advanced 3-D Locator System
under development by the Department of Homeland Security. The system needs to provide timely operational support for all-discipline,
all-hazards scenarios in a broad range of environmental conditions and terrain. Users of Advanced 3-D Locator System are the following: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Emergency Preparedness and Response Portfolio - Federal,
State, Local and Tribal incident responders and managers
- DHS / Emergency Preparedness / Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA)
- All lead and supporting Federal agencies of the National Response Plan
- Law Enforcement
agencies
- Fire Departments
There is a huge utility to DHS of such a 3D locator system. There are over 2 million emergency responders (ERs) in the US
with the mission to save lives, while staying alive themselves. Emerging technologies are critical for meeting the U.S. Fire
Administration’s goal: reduce firefighter fatalities by 25% in the next five years. Existing technology allows first
responders to monitor their own safety, e.g., Personal Alert Safety System (PASS) and Heads-Up-Display (HUD) units, and to
send and receive messages from incident command (IC), however reoccurring failures and user error have led to fatalities.
A lack of status, condition, location, task, resource, threat, and exit accessibility information, or inability to convey
this information among emergency responders (ERs), Strike Teams, and Incident Command (IC) can result in civilian and responder
casualties. The following are some of the required performance measures
for this locator system:
- Locator
must send information including location-related information
- Locator must wirelessly transmit inside or outside of structures and through rubble to an off-site incident command
post, on-site incident command posts, emergency responders, and/or other authorized parties including within teams of responders.
- Locator must be self-initializing, self-calibrating,
self-adjusting and must have selfdiagnostic capabilities to ensure speed and reliability.
- Locator must operate outside all buildings and inside of almost all
buildings, no matter their structural state and environmental conditions.
-
Primary incident command posts should be able to monitor the status of the locator and its
host from a radial distance from 30 meters to 100 meters (per relay).
-
Locator must be able to specify the location of its host in three dimensions within 6 meters
(3 meters desired).
- The base station
software must be able to display location and identification of personnel.
-
The base station must be able to display general-to-specific information (the ability to
drill down from an overall scene to a specific individual) about an operation/incident and its emergency responder participants.
- The base station must include visualization
tools that:
- Allow incident commanders and site personnel to easily interpret
incoming displayed information.
- Display the location of an emergency responder in easy to understand
coordinates. (One form of display must be a wire-frame like view of the building structure with the position of each responder
indicated. The wire-frame view must include a scale showing grid spaces of approximately 10 feet in every direction.)
- Allow the user to identify, group, and categorize responders as desired
Optionally, the coordinates returned by the locator can be input to a Geographic Information
System (GIS) system (including a building map or equivalent for underground structures).
EXAMPLE 2: CELL PHONE BASED POSITIONING INSIDE BUILDINGS Mobile
networks (GSM, GPRS, UTMS, CDMA) are available everywhere but the positioning accuracy is rather
low. By calculating the signal’s time and distance to nearby cell-phone towers, mobile networks can calculate a position,
but the accuracy is rather low (50-300 mts). This means that the position of calls from mobile phones located in a multi-story
building provide information that will at best identify a few buildings or the block from which the call originated. It’s
also possible that a mobile phone (if it’s on the top floors of a tall building) can be connected to a transmitter in
a neighboring cell, causing the accuracy to go down to kilometers. Calls from mobile phones in multistory buildings provide
information that will identify a few buildings or the block that the call originated. Solutions
to increase the accuracy of mobile networks already exist in the USA, in which mobile clients are located with the help of
supplementary information (e.g., postal-code information, streets, town names, etc.). Accuracy is further improved by using
the time taken by the signal to reach the mobile device. But due to lack of directional information, users can be located
anywhere in a circular band (or a section of a circular band) around a base station, so uncertainty remains. It’s important to solve indoor positioning problems, because by 2005 there will be 184 million U.S. wireless subscribers
(Jupiter Research, 2001). Moreover, according to the National Emergency Number Association, more than 30 percent of 911 calls
in the US originate from mobile phones—a number expected to soon outpace 911 wireline calls. A multitude of applications and services would benefit from indoor positioning and navigation. Technologies such as GPS
and initiatives such as the U.S. Federal Communications Commission’s E-911 mandate generated a lot of interest in location-based
services (LBSs). However, despite GPS technology and the positioning capabilities of cellular networks, millions of square
meters of indoor space (i.e., office buildings, airports, convention centers, etc.) are out of reach.

Enter content here
Enter content here
Enter content here
|